Soil fungal communities respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed southeastern US forest ecosystem

Abstract

Prescribed fire is an important management tool to reduce fuel loads, to remove non-fire adapted species and to sustain fire-adapted taxa in many forested ecosystems of the southeastern USA. Yet, the long-term effects of recurring prescribed fires on soil fungi and their communities in these ecosystems remain unclear. We Illumina MiSeq sequenced and analyzed fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) amplicons from a long-term prescribed burn experiment that has implemented different regimes for nearly a quarter century to evaluate the effects of differing prescribed fire intervals and the season of their implementation on soil-inhabiting fungal communities. Unburned plots were used as a reference to represent the compositional state resulting from fire suppression. Our data show that while the recurring burning or the season of the prescribed burning do not affect richness and diversity of the fungal communities, the frequent (two and three year interval) fires maintain a fire-adapted community that is distinct from those in unburned reference plots. Subsequent indicator taxon analyses identified a total of 37 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) that were more frequent in the frequently implemented burns and 26 OTUs that were more frequent in the fire suppressed treatment. We conclude that frequent prescribed burning maintains fire selected soil fungal communities that may support plant communities that are composed of desired fire adapted or fire tolerant species that dominate the frequently burned areas.

  • Citation: Oliver, Alena K.; Callaham, Mac A.; Jumpponen, Ari 2015. Soil fungal communities respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed southeastern US forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management. 345: 1-9. 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.020

Requesting Print Publications

Publication requests are subject to availability. Fiscal responsibility limits the hardcopies of publications we produce and distribute. Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, distributed and printed.

Please make any requests at pubrequest@fs.fed.us.

Publication Notes

  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
  • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.